Posted by: watchman146 | May 8, 2008

Evangelical Manifesto

Have you heard about this Evangelical Manifesto? A bunch of big wigs got together in Washington and put together a summary of values that Evangelicals hold to. What makes this different than previous documents like this is that it wasn’t hijacked by political interests or pet theological interests (calvinist, dispensationalist, etc.). I suppose I could quibble about a few things but, I liked it.

Here are two different perspectives on this document:

  • Click Here - the first perspective is from the long lost blogger, Ben Irwin, who ran off to England and forgot about his stateside rabble.
  • Click Here -  this second perspective is Michael Patton giving a summary of the typical response from Colorado Springs and the swamps of Tennessee (no offense)

What do you think?

Posted in church | Tags: , , ,

« Conversion Process
Sleepers Awake »

Responses

Don’t have time for a long comment right now-but the E.M. is right down my alley-it’s moderate, reasonable, and humble tone should have a unifying effect which will no doubt make Christianity ultimately more attractive to the world at large. It once again reminds us of the primary foundation of Christianity-”belief” in Christ, and how that belief is inextricably linked to good works-basically we should (1) love God and (2) love our neighbors. I’m totally on board. Unfortunate that JD didn’t sign. Maybe he’ll have a change of heart.

By: Mark on May 9, 2008
at 9.01 am

well, you asked what i thought, so here it is… i’m actually enjoying reading the various opinions here and there around the web. i had some hesitations and misgivings before reading the document, but i’m actually quite impressed and invigorated after taking in the whole of what it addresses.

one of the things i like is that the authors have chosen not to list creationism and inerrancy as non-negotiables. for the first, there’s very little biblical justification anymore behind whatever the latest flavor of anti-natural-selection dessert is being served up; for the latter, somehow we can admit that we can’t prove the existence of God, but goshdarnit we have a golden egg this unprovable God laid right here. still, some people hold to these positions; so be it. there’s simply too much of a tendency to add items to the ever-increasing laundry list of ideas and doctrines to which we have to pledge allegiance before we’re allowed into the room marked “Christian.”

nothing’s going to please everybody, and there are a few things i object to. for instance, i don’t agree with this statement: We Evangelicals should be defined theologically, and not politically, socially, or culturally. Jesus’ message uses “action” verbs: teach them to DO as I have commanded you, LOVE God and LOVE your neighbor, by this will all men know … if you LOVE one another. any theology that defines us must have feet.

i did, however, like these words: We are also troubled by the fact that the advance of globalization and the emergence of a global public square finds no matching vision of how we are to live freely, justly, and peacefully with our deepest differences on the global stage. somehow, we’ve got to figure out how we’re going to peacefully share the same bathroom over the next few decades in our ever-shrinking world.

one interesting thing: maybe i missed it, but there doesn’t seem to be a great emphasis on evangelism in this Evangelical Manifesto. do you think that was intentional? i didn’t see a single chick tract referenced in the bibliography…

more than anything, i find myself motivated and energized by the very positive nature of the piece - that it isn’t yet another “here’s everything we’re against” rant but an effort to make the gospel again a message of good news. imagine that - the gospel being good news. American Christianity has lost this defining characteristic that once served it well.

perhaps one unintended benefit of the proposal is a clear opportunity to take this EM (Evangelical Manifesto) and align it with the other EM (Emergent Manifesto) and finally have all our EM & EMs in a row without demonizing the other side.

one can only hope…

mike rucker
fairburn, georgia, usa
mikerucker.wordpress.com

By: mikerucker on May 9, 2008
at 10.07 pm

Leave a response






Your response:

Categories